When do I eat that post workout snack?

Just how important is that post workout snack?  Is it necessary to eat it right after my workout, even before I shower?

Evidence shows us that during and following a workout, our bodies crank up the number of amino acid transporters (little taxis for small pieces of protein) on the surface of muscle cells, secondly, insulin sensitivity is increased, so muscles take in sugar and fat from the blood stream more readily, and finally, an increase in circulating anabolic (muscle building) hormones occurs.  Thus we have an environment favoring protein accretion and presumably muscle growth.  Ingesting dietary protein at this time is optimal as our bodies will preferably utilize recently ingested nutrients before taking from the free floating amino acid pool, or if that is exhausted, from storage.  Taking from “storage” of course is generally not preferable because it requires taking things apart to get at the necessary amino acids, or breaking down muscle, as that is one place amino acids are in abundance.  There is no consensus on exactly how much protein (the supplier of amino acids in our diet) is optimal following a resistance training workout but literature suggests .25g/kg bodyweight might work the best.

Of course protein is NOT nearly as important as refueling muscle glycogen (stored sugar, used by muscles), which, again, the literature varies but generally 1-2g/kg bodyweight as soon as possible following the workout (any type of workout, not just resistance training).  Additionally, ingesting carbohydrates with protein appears to aid with amino acid absorption.  Ideal carbohydrate to protein ratio in a post workout snack is 3-4:1.  Done deal right?  Everyone should have a post workout snack within an hour of the workout to optimize recovery, and muscle growth. Hold on, while all this is well supported in the scientific literature and appears to be true, there is another side to it.

Evidence also shows us that this “window” of opportunity, the hour following the workout, doesn’t just disappear after an hour.  The window gradually closes, remaining open to some degree up to six hours following the workout, in some cases, scientists find it remains open, though not as “wide” up to 24 hours.  Furthermore, athletes who fail to eat during the 1 hour “window” of opportunity but still consume enough calories to support their needs over a 24 hour period appear to make similar gains in muscle mass and performance to those athletes who consume protein and carbohydrates in the recommended amount during the “window” following their workout

Of course more work needs to be done to determine exactly what we ought to be doing but likely what we’ll find is some athletes, elite athletes perhaps, who pay close attention to nutrient timing will indeed gain that extra fraction of a benefit that is important at their level.  The rest of us are probably not going to suffer performance decrements so long as we are getting the right foods in the right amounts in the long run.  There is more to this picture, as the “speed” of absorption of the protein matters, the “quality” matters as well.  Ideally high quality (contains all amino acids in appropriate amounts, generally animal products, meat, dairy, eggs, fish, poultry), though adequate amounts can be taken from the right combinations of plant based foods as well, however, the speed of absorption may not be optimal.  I will talk more on this in a future post.  For now, the main messages are as follows:

For elite athletes, who are training more than once per day, have a snack immediately following your training session consisting of carbohydrates at 1g/kg bodyweight, and an amount of high quality fast digesting protein (whey is a good example of this) equal to .25g/kg bodyweight, then repeat in another hour.  This should be adequate to replenish muscle glycogen, and presumably stave off protein degradation, which will be necessary for performing the second training session.

For athletes who are trying to lose weight, or do not train multiple times per day, nutrient timing is not as important.  Simply make sure that you eat a regularly scheduled meal, such as lunch or dinner within a couple hours of the workout.  A normal meal, such as a turkey sub, salad, and juice will cover your nutritional needs from the workout just fine.  Your goal is to make sure that you are getting the calories you need over the whole day.

If you are not trying to lose weight, and are training hard, in fact, if you are trying to gain muscle mass, its probably a good idea to have a post workout snack, BUT adjust the rest of your meals accordingly, for gaining muscle mass, you only need an additional 300 kcal per day, anymore than that and the mass gained will not be muscle.

Hope this helps, thanks for reading!

RPE for Tracking Workout Intensity

Earlier, I spoke about stress management as an important concept to integrate to avoid overtraining.  Another way to make sure your energy well is full (or at least mostly full) is with a detailed training log.

If you keep a training log (you should, if you want to maximize your training), you likely jot down sets, reps, intensity, and/or time, among other things.  A training log can be a helpful tool because improvements, as well as performance decrements, can be identified over time.  In addition to these variables, I recommend adding rate of perceived exertion, or RPE to each set or interval in your routine.  RPE, of course, in its most understood and familiar version, the BORG RPE scale.  This version is strongly correlated with heart rate and is a well supported tool for gauging exercise intensity during steady state exercise.  Lately research has been growing in support of RPE as a way to gauge exercise intensity for intermittent activity, such as between sets when resistance training. The idea is, upon finishing a set, the individual gives a rating on a scale from 1-10.  That number represents the amount of effort it took to execute that set or interval.  Here’s the scale:

10 – maximal, nothing left

9 – Near maximal, maybe 1 rep left

8 – Hard, maybe 2 reps left

7 — Moderately hard

6 – Moderate, second warm up set, technique

1-5 – Technique practice

Mind you, this is a modified scale, the original BORG RPE scale, mentioned above, and in the link is a bit different.  You could use that one if you want to, for this post; we’ll stick with the one above.  Ideally, for resistance training, you want interset RPE to be 7, 8, or 9.  An RPE of 10 is too high, and an RPE below 7 is more appropriate for warm up or technique practice.  Here is an example of how RPE may be used in a resistance training session.  Below is an excerpt from my training log.  You can see the particular exercise (back squat), the prescribed volume (3 sets of 8 repetitions), how hard I should be working (RPE 7-8), and how much time to take between sets (3-4 minutes).  Then to the right there are boxes, each divided in half by a diagonal line, for each of the three sets.  In the top half of each box I recorded the weight, in pounds that I lifted, then in the bottom half I entered a number from the modified RPE scale, representing how hard the set was to complete;

log excerpt1-1
Training log with RPE

So that 7, 7.5, and 8.5 in the bottom segment of the box under each set is my rating of the effort it took to complete the first, second, and third set, respectively.  It is not the amount of repetitions.  I don’t necessarily need to write that, I already know I am doing 8.  Now let’s have a look at an identical excerpt a week later:

log excert2
Training log with RPE

I rated my effort at 8, 9, and 9 for the first, second, and third set, respectively.  The RPE I entered during this session are higher than the previous one, yet the weight I lifted was the same.  It’s evident that it I felt like it took more effort the second time to lift the same weight.  This revelation can be useful.  If my RPE continues to be high I may need to adjust my intensity or training volume.  I want RPE to be at a 7 or 8, as prescribed, pushing too hard could put me in a state of underperformance, one that wouldn’t be detected until I found myself days or weeks later lowering the amount of weight, which would be flagged as a performance decrement, or worse, a failure to adapt.  Thus tracking RPE is more telling; had I simply tracked repetitions (which likely wouldn’t have changed much from session to session), instead of RPE in my training log, I may not have questioned anything until it was too late.

Once I am done, I can also use RPE to rate the entire workout session.  This is called “session RPE” and it is useful, not only for monitoring effort but estimating workload.  I will get into that in more detail in a future post.

To summarize, if I am pushing to hard, I want to know before my performance suffers.  If I catch myself early, I can make adjustments to allow for recovery, if I do not, I run the risk of falling into a state of chronic underperformance, or worse, injury.  From there I could be looking at weeks or even months to get back to my original performance capacity.  Adding RPE to my training log is a simple and easy change that allows me to fine tune my training intensity and volume and thus have a positive impact on my performance.

Thanks for reading!


Ready to improve your health and/or performance? Check out my remote, holistic, Nutrition Coaching program!

An Athletic Performance Testing Battery Primer

stop watchAn athletic performance test battery is a series of valid and reliable physical tests that assess important physiological components which are necessary to meet the demands of the sport.  For instance, the sport of basketball demands lower body explosive power (for jumping and accelerating),  ability to change direction rapidly, upper body strength (pulling down rebounds, shooting, passing), speed (fast break, getting back on defense), and anaerobic endurance (running/sprinting up and down the court repeatedly).  Thus a basketball-specific athletic test should include a specific test for each of these components.  Each specific test should be valid (it test what is designed to test) and reliable (repeated tests result in similar scores).  The order that each test is administered matters, the least fatiguing tests are performed early, saving the more fatiguing tests for last.   Adequate rest between trials and tests is important as well.  Test selection may also be influenced by availability of equipment and facilities, as well as the number of athletes being tested.  For example, a maximum bench press test is wonderful for assessing upper body strength and is appropriate for basketball players however; it is time intensive and requires specific equipment that is not portable, so testing an entire team would not be easy.  Grip strength can be measured quickly and easily with a hand-grip dynamometer, granted it’s not as sexy as a 1RM bench press test but it is a valid measure of upper body strength.  Since both the bench press and hand-grip dynamometer test strength, including both tests in one battery would be redundant, so pick one.  Finally, a proper warm up is a necessary component of an athletic testing battery, for both safety, as well as accurate results.

So to summarize an athletic performance test battery:

  • includes a warm-up
  • has specific tests appropriate for the athlete,
  • avoids redundancy,
  • has a specific test order, and
  • allows adequate recovery between trials.

I also recommend a cessation of intense physical activity 48 hours prior to the test battery, once again for both safety and accuracy of testing data.

With that, here is a sample basketball specific test battery:

Grip strength assessment
Standing broad jump
Vertical jump
Medicine ball put
Hexagon test
Sprint test
T-test
Line drill (suicide drill)

Mind you, this is a sample test battery meant to reinforce the tenets discussed above; there are other possible and effective permutations.  Having said that, with this sample test battery we can see the test order goes from least fatiguing to most fatiguing and all the components are addressed (upper body strength, upper and lower body power, agility, speed, and anaerobic endurance).  Each of these tests has been validated in athletic populations and deemed reliable.  As a bonus, each test requires minimal equipment and can be easily administered to large or small groups.

An athletic performance test battery performed once, is minimally useful.  Experienced athletes should consider a sport specific test battery, at minimum, 10-12 weeks prior to opening day.  Then undergo a second one after 7-8 weeks to allow time for adjustments in the training program before the season begins.  A third could happen at mid season, once again, this is to assure that training benefits are being maintained, and if not, you want to know sooner, to make adjustments.  For an endurance athlete, you must decide when your “season” is; perhaps building your training/testing schedule around the most important competitions or races would make the most sense.  I’ll talk more about endurance athletic testing in a future post.

Here are some additional examples of sport specific athletic testing batteries we use:

TEST BATTERY TEXT

Consequently, former athletes planning a return after a long layoff, or novice athletes who haven’t been training or competing regularly, should first consider a general fitness battery.  They are suitable for nearly all healthy people, carry very low risk of injury or episode, and provide useful information for building a foundation for training, or putting together the early stages of a comprehensive training program.  I’ll address this scenario in more detail next week but take note athletic performance test batteries should only be undertaken by individuals who are fit and have been training for several weeks or longer.

Have you performed a testing battery before?  Did you find it helpful?  If you didn’t, or need help interpreting the results, or how to best use them to your advantage please reach out.  We offer athletic performance testing and consulting to teams and individuals.

Thanks for reading.

Matt